Re: No fault cell phone law

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cm android 
Sujet : Re: No fault cell phone law
De : indira (at) *nospam* ghandi.net (Indira)
Groupes : comp.mobile.android
Date : 21. Mar 2024, 01:17:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <utfubl$1vpk7$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
The Real Bev wrote:

If you don't know what your last category is, take this test to find out.
https://www.humanmetrics.com/personality
 I tried to read this stuff decades ago and found it hopelessly useless.
I used to teach this stuff so I'm professionally trained in the corporate
world as to what it means, where many who "think" they understand it, try
to make it into what it's not. It has limitations. But it's also useful.

But from what you wrote, you're clearly a very strong "J" type person.
 No idea what that is.  If you seriously want me and everyone else to know, spit it out.
In a nutshell, M-B takes only four characteristics of human beings, where
there are hundreds of possible characteristics, so that's the first
limitation - it's only measuring four things about human nature.
Only two of the four characteristics have anything to do with each other.
The other two characteristics have nothing to do with the rest of them.
The two that have anything to do with each other are the middle two.
b. How you prefer to... get data to make decisions
c. How you prefer to... act on that data to make decisions
The other two have NOTHING to do with each other, but are important too.
a. How you prefer to... energize and in what kind of environment
d. How you prefer to... organize your life and expect others to act

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Mar 24 * Re: No fault cell phone law36The Real Bev
17 Mar 24 `* Re: No fault cell phone law35Stan Brown
17 Mar 24  +* Re: No fault cell phone law7Frank Slootweg
17 Mar 24  i+- Re: No fault cell phone law1Stan Brown
17 Mar 24  i`* Re: No fault cell phone law5The Real Bev
17 Mar 24  i `* Re: No fault cell phone law4Frank Slootweg
17 Mar 24  i  `* Re: No fault cell phone law3The Real Bev
18 Mar 24  i   `* Re: No fault cell phone law2Frank Slootweg
18 Mar 24  i    `- Re: No fault cell phone law1Andrew
17 Mar 24  +* Re: No fault cell phone law4AJL
17 Mar 24  i+- Re: No fault cell phone law1Frankie
18 Mar 24  i`* Re: No fault cell phone law2Stan Brown
18 Mar 24  i `- Re: No fault cell phone law1AJL
17 Mar 24  `* Re: No fault cell phone law23Andrew
17 Mar 24   +* Re: No fault cell phone law2The Real Bev
18 Mar 24   i`- Re: No fault cell phone law1Andrew
20 Mar 24   `* Re: No fault cell phone law20Carlos E.R.
20 Mar 24    +* Re: No fault cell phone law17AJL
20 Mar 24    i+* Re: No fault cell phone law10Carlos E.R.
20 Mar 24    ii`* Re: No fault cell phone law9Carlos E.R.
20 Mar 24    ii `* Re: No fault cell phone law8Andrew
21 Mar 24    ii  `* Re: No fault cell phone law7Hank Rogers
21 Mar 24    ii   `* Re: No fault cell phone law6Andrew
21 Mar 24    ii    +- Re: No fault cell phone law1Andrew
23 Mar 24    ii    `* Re: No fault cell phone law4The Real Bev
23 Mar 24    ii     +- Re: No fault cell phone law1Your Name
24 Mar 24    ii     +- Re: No fault cell phone law1Harry S Robins
29 Mar 24    ii     `- Re: No fault cell phone law1sms
20 Mar 24    i`* Re: No fault cell phone law6The Real Bev
20 Mar 24    i `* Re: No fault cell phone law5Carlos E.R.
20 Mar 24    i  `* Re: No fault cell phone law4The Real Bev
21 Mar 24    i   `* Re: No fault cell phone law3Indira
21 Mar 24    i    `* Re: No fault cell phone law2The Real Bev
21 Mar 24    i     `- Re: No fault cell phone law1Indira
21 Mar 24    `* Re: No fault cell phone law2Frank Slootweg
24 Mar 24     `- Re: No fault cell phone law1Andrew

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal