Liste des Groupes | Revenir à cm android |
Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:All that proves is that the courts are thoroughly corrupt. A lot of thoseChris wrote:Says who? It'll solve nothing.Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:>David Higton wrote:>In message <uuttdi$2o2ua$1@dont-email.me>>
Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>Oh and the election wasn't stolen.>
The reality, i.e. what was determined from the observable facts, was
that
...they stopped counting in the middle of the night,
As per their rules (in a few counties) laid down before the election began.
People are allowed to sleep.
Only to resume counting a relatively short time later?
>
Furthermore, if you are counting mail-in votes (which should be
banned), you should be required to remain in that room until it's
DONE. No exceptions.
There's only one reason why you want to ban mail-in ballots.
Already happened. All of Trump's cases claiming the above were either>threw out the>
observers,
Because they were trying to interfere with the count.
No they weren't.
>They were no longer observers.>
They were observers.
>>and trucked in enough fraudulent ballots to swing the>
election.
Didn't happen.
They had overwhelming motive and opportunity. Therefore, it is
reasonable to shift the burden of proof to those who claim the
election was clean.
dismissed or found against him. 0/62 is an impressive failure rate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_U.S._presidential_election
You keep crying.
lol. If you really believe this, living life must be difficult for you.In all cases of voter fraud two things were discovered 1) in no instance>
was there enough to come close to affect any vote, 2) most of the
fraudulent ballots were in favour of GOP candidates.
"Cases of voter fraud" as reported by the fake media, which simply
does not report cases of fraud in favor of Democrat candidates.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.