Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android when RCS messaging is involved

On 2024-04-15 22:09, Anonymous wrote:

Alan wrote:

On 2024-04-14 19:48, Anonymous wrote:

Alan wrote:

On 2024-04-13 22:23, Anonymous wrote:

Chris wrote:

Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:

Chris wrote:

Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:

Chris wrote:

Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:

Chris wrote:

Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:

Java Jive wrote:

On 04/04/2024 01:58, Hank Rogers wrote:

>
So is trump. They are much alike and have never done anything wrong. Ever.
Neither has ever committed a crime or screwed a customer or business partner.

>
That is provably untrue, in that Trump has already lost two civil cases,
wherein one of which a jury found him to be a rapist  - in most civilised
people's view, that is both committing a crime and screwing someone.

>
Losing a civil case is not the same as a criminal conviction.

>
The claim was the he "never done anything wrong". Losing a civil case is a
clear case of doing something wrong.

>
No it's not. Anyone can sue anyone for anything.

>
And? If the court finds against you you've legally done something wrong.

>
Not morally.

>
Are you saying that Trump has never done anything morally wrong? You've
completely lost any sense of reality.
>
At the very least he cheated on two of his wives. He sexually assaulted one
woman (probably more) and he defrauded several banks and the IRS.

>
If he legitimately "knife to the throat" raped women,

>
What the fuck does that mean?
>

then why wasn't
he criminally prosecuted?

>
Like you said yourself the US system doesn't provide justice, especially
against rich, powerful men. Sexual assault hasn't been treated well by the
CJS for a long time.

>
Well, you probably think Jacqueline Coakley was telling the truth. LOL!
>
Forget accusations, most rape _convictions_ are false.
>

If he defrauded the IRS, was he criminally
charged?

>
Not yet. Here's hoping...
>

The legal system very rarely has anything to do with
actual justice.

>
In the US, I agree. You've got the system you all wanted.
>

Also the state DA isn't just anyone and fraud or defamation aren't just
anything.
>
If you or I defrauded a bank or insurance company we'd rightly be
prosecuted.

>
Prosecuted under criminal statutes, not sued under civil.

>
Why? Civil law is just as important.

>
Standards of proof in the civil system is not as rigorous as that
in the criminal system.

>
Still evidence of wrongdoing.
>

Why should it be any different for Trump?

>
Nobody is saying it should be.

>
That's not true. You're saying he's done nothing wrong and shouldn't face
trial. The courts should decide.
>

Everyone is NYC has known for decades what kind of crook he is. If it
wasn't for the hundreds of millions of dollars he got from Fred he'd just
be pretty street criminal.
>

Further, he faces 91 further criminal charges in 4 separate cases,

>
All politically-motivated persecutions.

>
Lol. I love how the right are strong on law and order until one of their
own is found wanting in that dept. Then it's "persecution". Hypocrites the
lot of them.
>
How people for that, I don't know.

>
I want order. After that, we can have law. Instead, we have politically-
motivated persecutions for made-up crimes,

>
Federal law and election law are made up now, are they? The right were
desperate for Biden to be arrested for exactly the same as Trump. Again,
it's one rule for you and different rules for others. That's not how fair
society works.

>
There are countless laws that literally invent crimes and proscribe
punishments when there is no concrete harm being done to anyone or
anything.

>
Countless, really? Examples.

>
Notable you didn't answer this.

>
All laws that punish mere possession of firearms by peaceable men, for one,
if you really want to get into that debate.
>
Also, Bragg hasn't told us what underlying felony Trump allegedly committed.

>
Sure he has.

>
No he hasn't.
>

It is literally in the indictments.
>
<https://www.scribd.com/document/636099588/Donald-J-Trump-Indictment>
>
I'll give you one example:
>
'THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, by this indictment, accuses the defendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE , in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows: The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoice from Michael Cohen dated February 14, 2017, marked as a record of the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.'
>
That's a FELONY, doofus.
>
There are 33 more listed there.

>
Those are upgraded misdemeanors, because there is allegedly an UNDERLYING
felony. Show us the UNDERLYING felony.

>
You don't understand the law.
>
There doesn't have to be an "underlying felony".
>
There just has to be an underlying crime that the falsification was undertaken in furtherance of.

>
Fine, then what was the underlying crime?

 Federal election contribution crimes.