Liste des Groupes | Revenir à cm android |
On 2024-04-18 12:13, The Real Bev wrote:No. There are a lot of stupid people out there. But, with certain exceptions, we should have that right.On 4/18/24 2:11 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:So again, yes or no:On 2024-04-18 08:20, The Real Bev wrote:Like Mexico...On 4/17/24 10:18 AM, Alan wrote:>On 2024-04-17 10:05, The Real Bev wrote:>On 4/15/24 11:48 PM, Chris wrote:>
>Pre-empirically carrying a gun is not "self-defence". Its weakness.>
Billions of people are quite capable of not becoming a victim without
needing guns for "self-defence".
Yes, screaming I AM NOT A VICTIM at the thug with a knife will definitely send him on his way abashed and save Granny from being harmed. Or perhaps you were thinking of the umbrella with the sharpened tip?
You still haven't explained why the US has so many more deaths than
other countries similar to it.
I have no idea why. Do you? Perhaps we are just violent people.
>
Given that this is true, how do we best protect ourselves when law enforcement is too far away to be protective?
The same way as other countries do: by banning weapons. You do not let
violent people easy access to weapons.
Knives, rebar, baseball bats, tennis rackets, 2x4s...
Bend over and smile?A few nights ago a guy pulled a knife on a woman, forced her to drive to a different location and raped her. This happened a few blocks away. What should she have done?>
Same as in any modern and evolved country.
She was sitting in her car in a restaurant parking lot at 8:30 at night in a "safe" neighborhood. He jumped into her car. Perhaps she should have locked her doors, but that's alien behavior here.
If someone threatens you with ANY weapon they have forfeited their right to decent treatment. Perhaps no weapon is required if they are physically threatening. We should all be allowed to protect our own lives. Period.
Are you advocating that every person carries a firearm on his or her
person at all times?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.