Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android when RCS messaging is involved

Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:

Chris wrote:

Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:

Chris wrote:

Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:

Chris wrote:

Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:

Chris wrote:

There are countless laws that literally invent crimes and proscribe
punishments when there is no concrete harm being done to anyone or
anything.

>
Countless, really? Examples.

>
Notable you didn't answer this.

>
All laws that punish mere possession of firearms by peaceable men, for one,
if you really want to get into that debate.

>
Why do "peaceable men" need to have a gun? In modern society there's no
need for anyone to be carrying guns. It's just boys pretending to be men.

>
Because bad and evil men exist. This isn't changed by modern society.

>
No one needs vigilantes.

>
Self-defense is not vigilantism.

>
Pre-empirically carrying a gun is not "self-defence".

>
Yes it is.

>
Nope. It's a pre-meditated act. You're armed with the intention to harm.
>

>
Those in the United States who lawfully carry a concealed handgun
hope they never need to use it, but want to be prepared for that
eventuality.

 Why? I've been to the US. It isn't as lawless you make out.
 As a visitor I'm more worried about getting caught in cross-fire than
actually being a victim of crime.