Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting

Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

On 2024-11-27 00:15:06 +0000, Joel said:

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

 
And it had how much storage, again?  Heh.

 
You imagine that as some great "gotcha", do you?

 
Yeah, it is, because it's where Apple rips people off.  Why is 256 GB
still the basic option?  In almost 2025?  Retarded.

>
Because you obviously don't understand Apple's CPUs and / or stuck in
the same old MHz-myth style nonsense that caused Apple to swap to Intel
CPU years ago. Apple's chips simply don't actually need as much RAM as
Intel CISC CPUs do.

The 256 GB is storage, not RAM, and why would RISC need *less* RAM?
You're talking out of your ass, apparently.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.