Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting

Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

On 2024-11-27 13:31:05 +0000, Joel said:

Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

On 2024-11-27 00:15:06 +0000, Joel said:

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

>
And it had how much storage, again?  Heh.

>
You imagine that as some great "gotcha", do you?

>
Yeah, it is, because it's where Apple rips people off.  Why is 256 GB
still the basic option?  In almost 2025?  Retarded.

>
Because you obviously don't understand Apple's CPUs and / or stuck in
the same old MHz-myth style nonsense that caused Apple to swap to Intel
CPU years ago. Apple's chips simply don't actually need as much RAM as
Intel CISC CPUs do.

>
The 256 GB is storage, not RAM, and why would RISC need *less* RAM?
You're talking out of your ass, apparently.

>
Another moron troll for the killfile.  :-\

  Another moron Apple dumbshit to killfile me so he doesn't have to
learn the truth.