Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting

On 2024-12-06 16:28, Joel wrote:

-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:

On 12/6/24 9:28 AM, Joel wrote:

-hh wrote:

On 12/5/24 11:35 PM, Alan wrote:

On 2024-12-05 19:32, Joel wrote:

-hh wrote:
>

Make sure to also include an NVMe benched on the open slot that's on the
slower PCIe 3 bus that you've been saying is your 'future expansion'.

>
You act as though PCI-e 3 isn't great already.

>
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thunderbolt_(interface)>

>
Joel's acting as though Thunderbolt 3 wasn't great already:
>
* bandwidth of a PCIe 3.0 x4 is 4 gigabytes per second = 4 GB/.
>
* Thunderbolt 3's bandwidth is 4000 MB/s = 5 GB/s.
>
And 2024 Macs have TB5, which means 10 GB/sec bandwidth, enabling
an external SSD to perform like a 2TB internal Apple OEM SSD from
a 2020 vintage Mac Studio.

>
OK, none of that makes what I have any slower.

>
Nah, it shows where your claim that USB is slow is factually incorrect.
>
So much for your standards for "high end" which just aren't really...
>
Plus it shows that stuff just gets labelled by you as 'overpriced' is
also higher performance gear than your self-proclaimed "high end" stuff.
>
Per the old adage of "Speed cost money. How fast can you afford to go?",
its evident that you're deriding that which you want, but won't afford.
>
...and still waiting on you to post benchmarks, too... /s

  I haven't addressed the external storage's speed, but immediate access
of internal drives is a higher grade or level.

That is a question of speed and you're just making yourself look stupid by trying to create clever sounding phrases.

 That being said, Win11 and 10 did install pretty painlessly, on my
system.  Just one becomes aware that Linux will trump anything