Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting

On 2024-12-07 14:00, Joel wrote:

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2024-12-06 19:00, Joel wrote:

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2024-12-06 16:28, Joel wrote:

-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:

>
...and still waiting on you to post benchmarks, too... /s

>
I haven't addressed the external storage's speed, but immediate access
of internal drives is a higher grade or level.

>
That is a question of speed and you're just making yourself look stupid
by trying to create clever sounding phrases.

>
And you appear to be a genius, to have out-reasoned me at every turn,
along with -hh, it's amusing.

>
You haven't even understood the basic facts of what Thunderbolt is, doofus.
>
How is that my problem?

  I understand the claim that Thunderbolt's speed is comparable to
internal's.  I accept it, even.  It doesn't magically make an external
drive internal.

But your objection was that somehow the "access" of an external drive wasn't as "immediate", but now you accept that Thunderbolt is as fast as an internal four lane PCIe 3.0 bus (amazing that someone who claims to be as 1337 as yourself didn't already know about that, huh?).
So how is it less immediate?