Sujet : Re: RCS is not more private and secure than texting according to the FBI
De : andys (at) *nospam* nospam.com (Andrew)
Groupes : comp.mobile.android misc.phone.mobile.iphoneDate : 18. Dec 2024, 02:39:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <vjt953$cnq$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.13
Carlos E.R. wrote on Wed, 18 Dec 2024 01:15:45 +0100 :
If an iPhone is involved. It's fine on Android. The article you posted
says so.
>
You do not understand what happens.
RCS is Google's wet dream. Nobody needs it or wants it.
RCS works fine - much better than MMS ever was. Google just added a
proprietary encryption to it.
Proprietary, maybe, but they did not block Apple from using it. It was Apple who decided not even to try using it. Ok, it is not an standard, but it exists, it is there, ready to use. Just use, then agree into an standard, and implement it next.
The only reason RCS is in iPhones is the EU demanded Apple add it.
RCS encryption isn't there only because the EU didn't demand that too.
RCS is not more private and secure than texting according to the FBI
Re: RCS is not more private and secure than texting according to the FBI
