Sujet : Re: RCS is not more private and secure than texting according to the FBI
De : this (at) *nospam* ddress.is.invalid (Frank Slootweg)
Groupes : comp.mobile.android misc.phone.mobile.iphoneDate : 18. Dec 2024, 11:35:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NOYB
Message-ID : <vjuc1m.k7g.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
Carlos E.R. <
robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
On 2024-12-17 21:49, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
On 17.12.24 21:42, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2024-12-17 16:58, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
On 17.12.24 15:08, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2024-12-17 07:19, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
Avoid to use RCS!
>
If an iPhone is involved. It's fine on Android. The article you posted
says so.
>
You do not understand what happens.
RCS is Google's wet dream. Nobody needs it or wants it.
>
>
We know you say that, and we also know this to be false. Don't worry
about it :-)
You comment is redundant. In this particular case the FBI is a lot more
trustworthy than you will ever be.
The FBI doesn't contradict me at all.
Of course they don't. After all, you didn't give them permission to
disagree with you, did you!?
RCS is not more private and secure than texting according to the FBI
Re: RCS is not more private and secure than texting according to the FBI
