Re: RCS is not more private and secure than texting according to the FBI

On 22.12.24 08:59, Jörg Lorenz wrote:

On 21.12.24 17:13, Arno Welzel wrote:

Jörg Lorenz, 2024-12-21 08:53:
>

On 18.12.24 09:15, Alan wrote:

On 2024-12-17 23:22, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
No. Proprietary and encryption are NOT a contradiction.
>
Don't argue from false positions.

>
You do not understand the concept of asymmetric secure end-to-end
encryption. Those who own the service provide the encryption? Seriously?
Naive to the max.

>
You know the meaning of end-to-end-encryption?

>
Very stupid question. In this case it is a Zero-Trust issue.

 
In the developed world are not many encryption-users that would trust
either Google or Microsoft (there are more). It is not advisable to use
an encryption chain where one commercial company has the control over
the chain. Particularly when the company is located/headquartered in
Trumpistan.
 
You know what a "Masterkey" or a "Backdoor" is?