Re: One Note

Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:

Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:

Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:

Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:

Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:

Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:

Chris wrote:
 

Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:

Chris wrote:

 

Android 16 is the current version so it's possible the OneNote doesn't
support 13.

 
15 is  the newest release version, 16 is still in development.

 
According to wikipedia it was released this month.

You clearly didn't read even the first paragraph
 
"Android 16 is the upcoming major release of Android. The first
developer preview was released on November 19, 2024. Google expects the
platform to reach beta stage in January 2025 with a final release
expected in the second quarter of 2025."

 
The table here states it was released on 18th December:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_version_history

 
Nope, it doesn't.
 
The "December 18, 2024" date is followed by a *note* '[29]', which is
- as always in Wikipedia - also a link.
 
If you follow that link, you will get the 'Release notes' which cleary
says "Developer Preview 2", so exactly as Andy said "16 is still in
development" and proven by his (above quouted) quote from the Wikipedia
page.
 
'Release notes'
<https://developer.android.com/about/versions/16/release-notes>

 
Then the table is wrong. I was simply doing a quick internet search to help
the OP.

 
  That you can't be bothered to read for comprehension and follow links,
doesn't mean the table is wrong. See also Jörg comment about the colour
coding in the table.
 

Of course all of this should have been blatantly obvious, as Android
*15* was only released little over 3 months earlier. New Android
versions come (too) quickly, but not *that* quickly.

 
I don't use android, so not up to speed, hence why I thought wikipedia was
accurate.

 
  Huh? Then why do you subscribe to this group and say (to Jörg) "It
isn't on my phone?". And once more, Wikipedia *is* accurate (on this
issue).
 
  That you overlooked the note, etc. is of course perfectly allright.
Being flippant when people correct you, not so much.

 
How am I being flippant? I acknowledged the mistake.

  Sigh! You said (amongst others) "Then the table is wrong.", so you did
*not* acknowledge *your* mistake, but said that it was an error in the
Wikipedia page, which it isn't.

  Bottom line: You were wrong. The Wikipedia page is correct.