Re: Voicemail without a call

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cm android 
Sujet : Re: Voicemail without a call
De : this (at) *nospam* ddress.is.invalid (Frank Slootweg)
Groupes : comp.mobile.android
Date : 28. Mar 2025, 17:33:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NOYB
Message-ID : <vs6mgg.q7o.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> wrote:
On 2025-03-28, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
VanguardLH <V@nguard.lh> wrote:
[...]
However, I tend to distrust texts since most do not identify the caller.
I see "24530" as the caller.  What the fuck is that?  Personal callers
usually show their phone number, so there's a match up to my Contacts
list, but stupidly all those 2FA codes sent by a web site do NOT
identify the web site sent them, and 2FA mining is a problem.  Maybe I
just did something, like renew a prescription at my pharmacy's web site,
so a text from some garbage numbered sender that says it is from my
pharmacy that arrives within 2 minutes of my action at their web site
provides context for the text.  However, context is not the same as
identification. 
>
  Hmm? Strange! Not that I get that many SMS messages for 2SV or
information, but the ones I get, always have a 'name' - for example an
airline - or a telephone number.
>
  Perhaps this no-name problem is US-specific? (I am in The
Netherlands.)
 
My experience is same as yours - I always get a number - or if contacts
the name). I'm in UK.

  But, as implied, I also get names for some/most organizations which
are not in my Contacts on the phone. For example an airline (KLM) and
many, many others.

  Of course many of those may be in *a* contact list (mainly in the
(Mozilla Thunderbird) address book on my laptop), but in not the one on
my phone. Anyway, the other contact list is a email contact list,
without phone numbers.

  So these senders have ways to send their name instead of their number.

  But indeed, also for our pharmacy, it's a number, but it's always the
same number, so no problem. If I could be bothered, I could put the
number in my Contacts list. Problem solved.
>
[...]

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Mar 25 * Re: Voicemail without a call16Andy Burns
27 Mar 25 +- Re: Voicemail without a call1VanguardLH
27 Mar 25 `* Re: Voicemail without a call14Stan Brown
27 Mar 25  `* Re: Voicemail without a call13Jim Jackson
27 Mar 25   `* Re: Voicemail without a call12VanguardLH
28 Mar 25    `* Re: Voicemail without a call11Frank Slootweg
28 Mar 25     +* Re: Voicemail without a call7Jim Jackson
28 Mar 25     i`* Re: Voicemail without a call6Frank Slootweg
28 Mar 25     i +- Re: Voicemail without a call1VanguardLH
28 Mar 25     i +* Re: Voicemail without a call3AJL
28 Mar 25     i i`* Re: Voicemail without a call2Frank Slootweg
28 Mar 25     i i `- Re: Voicemail without a call1AJL
28 Mar 25     i `- Re: Voicemail without a call1Carlos E.R.
28 Mar 25     +- Re: Voicemail without a call1AJL
28 Mar 25     +- Re: Voicemail without a call1VanguardLH
28 Mar 25     `- Re: Voicemail without a call1Carlos E.R.

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal