On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 19:11:16 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :
Your non-hypothetical scenario claims that Apple use equal amounts of power
to android phones. That is clearly not the case given the benchmarks.
Huh? Chris, you do not know basic physics. If you have a screen of a
certain refresh rate and number of pixels made by Samsung for Apple
iPhones, do you think a similar Samsung screen made for an Android device
is going to use a vastly different wattage just because Apple branded it?
Apple screens are made by Samsung, LG & BOE.
They also make screens for a lot of other phone brands, Chris.
For you to claim that slapping an Apple logo on that screen magically
drastically reduces the wattage used under the same use, is absurd.
Your entire argument hinges on the absurdity that an Apple logo alone
drastically drops the amount of power similar devices use, Chris.
Then you agree that battery capacity will be the biggest determinant of the
life of a mobile device given comparison of two devices of equal output.
I do not.
Two devices of essentially equal wattage, but one has a battery capacity
half the other, will reach EOL sooner, even if Apple puts its logo on that
lower capacity device.
Specifically, you claim that Apple has special physics known only to them.
I have made no such claim. Why are you lying?
If you don't accept the math Chris,
What maths?!
I told you a hundred times the simple math that two devices of similar
wattage but with one having a battery capacity of half the other, will NOT
reach the EOL for the battery anywhere near at the same time.
That you claim they do is patently absurd, Chris.
They can't.
What you don't understand, Chris, is math. Arithmetic in particular.
Given two devices with essentially equal power consumption, the device with
twice the battery capacity will reach the 80% charge-cycle degradation
point well before the device with double that battery capacity.
There's a whole bunch of other factors involved which may have a
significant impact.
Bear in mind that the display is the biggest hog, and Apple uses the *same*
display everyone else uses, Chris.
Then you have the bullshit claimed "efficiency" of an iPhone which nobody
on the planet has ever found to be true, but let's give Apple 1% for that.
You have a claimed 1% efficiency and then a 100% decrease in capacity.
For you to claim they equal out is patently absurd Chris.
The math you claim is preposterously absurd.
It shows you don't know how to think logically.
You think the EU makes up these rules just for the fun of it, Chris?
You think almost no iPhone meets the bare minimum by accident, Chris?
You have yet to prove any of that. So no one believes you. Anyone can make
up bullshit.
You seriously deny that Apple uses the same displays as everyone else uses?
Seriously?
By you denying every facts, it doesn't make the fact bullshit.
It means you have no argument. Your claims are patently absurd.
You think Apple changing the calculations on the iPhone 15 are also by
accident Chris? Or that only the iPhone 15 and up barely meets the EU
minimum spec is by accident, Chris?
Prove this "barely meets" assertion and also show how android phones like
yours easily beat the spec as you've previously claimed.
Chris - it's patently absurd for you to claim that two similar devices,
with similar wattage use, but with one having half the battery capacity
will last the same amount of time to the 80% degradation - is absurd.
Note for the hard of thinking: referencing yourself making the exact same
unsubstantiated claims is not proof.
Your claim requires Apple devices to defy the laws of physics, Chris.
You have no concept of mathematical logic.
Marketing has no concept of mathematical logic.
Methinks you believe in Apple marketing bullshit instead of in basic math.
…