Sujet : Re: Which CPM systems are most popular?
De : john (at) *nospam* somewhere (John)
Groupes : comp.os.cpmDate : 27. Feb 2025, 04:29:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Thundernews - www.thundernews.com
Message-ID : <1827f30874bea828$21642$735129$6cdd266a@news.thundernews.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/26/25 3:49 PM, yeti wrote:
For me it was just CP/M what I used. At home on TRS-80, later C128 and
after those emulations, some on micro-controllers, some on PCs. Not so
far ago a Z80-MBC2 joined my zoo, but launching an emulation just stays
faster. At work I used more diverse hardware, but I only cared about
which one, when I had to transfer files between them because finding a
compatible disk format instead of needing Kermit was like winning the
lottery.
My nostalgia is attached to CP/M, instead of to a specific machine.
Good point. I've never used emulators for 'real work'. Only to program/debug code to be eventually sent to a real vintage machine. It keeps the hours down on the old hardware.
And I too recall the horrors of multiple disk formats! Sheesh, what a pain. I usually just ended up compressing everything (I think with LBR and SQUEEZE) and send it over via XMODEM to be received on a PC with PROCOMM. The PC was my repository. I'd then download to whatever other machine was the target.
-J