Sujet : Re: Which CPM systems are most popular?
De : mds (at) *nospam* bogus.nodomain.nowhere (Mike Spencer)
Groupes : comp.os.cpmDate : 08. Mar 2025, 07:53:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Bridgewater Institute for Advanced Study - Blacksmith Shop
Message-ID : <87v7skggiy.fsf@enoch.nodomain.nowhere>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7
John <
john@somewhere> writes:
But when I really started using computers was in college; and my
first was an Osborne 01. That started me down the CPM road. After
reading 'The Soul of CPM' book, I was on fire. Compared to what I
learned with the Osborne, I consider my college courses teaching me
the syntax of Fortran and Pascal to be a waste of time (and money!).
I got my first computer when I was in my mid-40s. In 1987 the O1 was
already obsolete. But I learned BASIC, Z80 assembler, K&R C and some
LISP on it, then used it as a terminal to connect to Unix and VMS
systems.
I'm really happy that I started with the O1. Extensive O1 and CPM
documentation available, system simple enough to understand without
recursive rabbit-hole excursions. All Linux now on hardware that I
don't really understand but I do understand the basic principals it
all works on.
(I check in on c.o.cpm periodically to watch for other O1 fans.)
-- Mike Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada