Re: If you're a fucking moron

Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:

On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 18:00:04 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>

While I would've worded it nicer, I agree that AI isn't super useful and
almost every implementation I've seen has been a marketing gimmick
and/or useless.

>
Idiot.
>
AI, or more properly, pattern matching, can be quite valuable in
image sharpening, background removal, and other image processing
tasks.
>
But the big push for "AI," as with all commercial products that
cater to imbeciles (and there are a LOT of those), is to provide
verbal and programming composition which any competent professional,
including myself, would summarily reject.
 
The imbeciles will love it, at least for a while, because it removes
a creative burden from their otherwise comatose brains.
>
Can AI replace YOU?  I would strongly believe that it can.
>
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

Larry, you really need to kill yourself.  I can't believe you would
pick on a post like that.  You're just a lost cause.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.