Re: I installed openSUSE Leap

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

Yeah, well, back to reality, I'm doing fine with openSUSE.

>
You are not remotely acquainted with reality, Jesus Crump.
>
But what happened to your prized Mint install, such that you felt
compelled to switch to OpenSUSE?

 
If you had actually read anything in the thread before replying, you'd
know that I couldn't go to Mint 22,

>
I did read, but you didn't say much:
>
"I ran into snags trying to switch/upgrade to Mint 22.x"
>
"I had problems with in-place upgrade and with installing clean from a
USB media"
>
>
Seems you gave up on Mint 22.x pretty quickly.

Read between the lines, man, the installer hung like that because they
wanted me to just keep my existing installation, the in-place upgrade
failing to work was locking me into keeping 21.x.  I had no way to get
to 22 without a clean install, which they don't want to support, even
though I *have* donated money to them.  So, that tells me to look
elsewhere, and I did.  openSUSE isn't perfect, but I don't dislike it.

and you know me, I'm an early
adopter.  So that was unacceptable.
 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I'm more than satisfied with Mint Cinnamon, I couldn't come up with a
better OS."  Jan 2024
>
"Mint Cinnamon is the best desktop OS in history, IMO."  Jan 2024
>
"Mint Cinnamon is so fantastic, giving me anything I could want out of
software, without M$'s involvement.  I'm just over the moon."  Jan 2024

 
I would still say that if I could've installed 22, but there are other
distros.
 

"Anyone clueful would be running Mint Cinnamon." Jul 27
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

 
Pretty sure I was drunk when I wrote that.

>
Why can't you face life without being drunk?

I can, but I like drinking sometimes.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.