Re: So Hows Dimdows-on-ARM Doing?

DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:

On 11/11/2024 11:23 AM, Joel wrote:

DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:

On 11/10/2024 6:17 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 18:07:03 -0500, Joel wrote:

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>

That *will* change.

>
That’s what I mean by “spouting hot air”.

>
You mean like an IntelAMD's fan?  Heh.

>
Look, we are agreed that x86 is a dead end.

>
2 GuhNoo idiots agreeing with each other about something irrational?
>
I can hardly believe it.

 
Oh, yeah sure, your claim that Win13 will be great on my current 10th
gen i5, totally "rational", dumbass.

>
I never said 'great'.  Quit lying.

Oh did I misquote you, sir, you only meant I could boot it and suffer
with it, like Win10 20H2 on my first gen i5, I had previously?  Heh.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.