Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col advocacy |
On 26/10/2024 08:01, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:Another advantage is familiarity with arguments and lines of reasoning. If I had a penny for every time some technologist thought that he came up with a brand new argument, for it only to turn out that it was discussed 1000 years ago, I'd be rich!On 10/26/24 1:51 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:That is the reaction of 99% of those who are exposed to it.On 26 Oct 2024 05:45:31 GMT, rbowman wrote:>
About the time Heidegger asked 'Why are there beings at all rather thanDid he mention the Anthropic Principle at all?
nothing?' in 'Introduction to Metaphysics' my head started to hurt. That
was sentence 1, chapter 1. It didn't get better from there on.
That’s a controversial one. Fred Hoyle used it to predict the existence of
an energetic state of the carbon atom without which heavier elements could
not be synthesized.
All philosophy is bullshit - including this philosophy :-)
>
But it isn't. It has tools enabling you to think in extremely different ways.
The problem is most people think it purports to reveal Truth, but it doesn't. It is however and interesting study of Lies.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.