Re: ******** Video: FOSS Superiority Versus Commercial Software **********

Le 28-11-2024, Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> a écrit :

A demo of GNU/Linux/FOSS superiority versus commercial software.
>
Prepare for a shock!
>
Astounding result!
>
Video location (30 days):
 
https://ufile.io/q72b6etu
>
Usenet location (forever):
>
alt.binaries.multimedia.transformation

That's an other video in which you manage to contradict yourself, to
prove you are a liar and to prove you don't know what you do. In less
than a quarter of an hour: that's a great job (yes, I know your video is
longer than that but the last minutes are useless and I didn't look at
them).

So, first of all, thanks for the fun. Just, in case you could control
yourself, can you laugh a little bit quieter? Because your lunatic laugh
will make my neighbours think me as a retard if they don't know they
hear a video and not me. I'm stupid, I agree, but I'd like to keep it
under reasonable limits. And your moron laugh doesn't comply to the
limits I can handle.

For the most obvious lying part, I don't believe you own a private jet
and a private yacht. No way. That's the most obvious evidence of your
lies. I don't know if anyone here believe that, but I don't.

For the contradictory parts, you manage to contradict yourself in this
video alone and with other claims. So for this video, you start by
saying that $12000 (I really don't like the English/American spelling of
money) is nothing to you and at the end of your video, you say it's a
huge amount of money. So, you have to choose if that matters to you or
not and stick with it. At least, for the length of your video, which is
a short period. I can understand someone changing his mind as years pass
by, but between the beginning and the end of a very short video, it's
just impressive. It means you have no clue of what you are doing, but
I'll comme back later on that.

You can have spotted, I put a plural on "parts" at the beginning of the
previous paragraph. It's because in your previous messages you said you
were using mathematica (which I said I didn't believe and your video
aimed to prove me wrong, just proved me right: that's another way in
which your video is great). And, in the end of your video, you said
mathematica is garbage (of course, not a such evolved word in your
limited vocabulary, but the meaning is the same).

Less obvious than your yacht and your private jet, the way your are
showing (mind you: I'm not saying using for a reason) proves you are not
using it. You just managed to download something on Internet to display
it in mathematica. It's far from being able to use mathematica by
yourself.

And by comparing mathematica to mathmod you just proved you have no clue
about the purpose of mathematica. And in this video, you proved you
don't use mathimatica, as I said in another message. You can only launch
it and load something you found on Internet in it, which is very
different.

And to prove what I said previously, that you don't know what you are
doing, there is the last part. You realized the colors are different in
mathematica and in mathmod. You don't know why, you just realize it. And
it's the ultimate proof. You have no idea if the colours have a meaning
or not. You have no idea why your colours are different. You are only
able to acknowledge the difference without the least explanation and
have to say something like "I did the things differently" which is not
an explanation but an acknowledgment of your lack of understanding of
your doing.

So all that in less than fifteen minutes is impressive. Good job.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io