Re: Linux advocacy

vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:

On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 12:00:12 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
<3fo5fj5o8mikejjqaa1errs2ev4tff9078@4ax.com>:

snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>

Seems like there isn't much Linux advocacy going on.[*]
 
Maybe that's because, Linux just works,

>
Yay! That's been true of Mac OS for many years;
congrats to the Linux world for finally catching on.

 
Then go to CSMA and waste your breath praising that overpriced
crapware.
 

so much so that it's even a bit boring.

>
A 'puter is supposed to be a tool to do a job,
the underpinnings should ideally be unnoticeable.
>
IMO 'puter hobbyists are mostly deviants.

 
Retarded.

>
Yes, you are.
>
Sn!pe is proper.  You might not agree with him all
the time (I don't) but he's not a bad correspondent.

Oh shut the fuck up, white boy, you're the queerest piece of shit,
defending the MacTard.  Why are you running Linux, then, fool, go buy
an iMac and an iPhone and an iWatch and iEveryFuckingThing, you
retarded monkey-ass goofball.  Fuck off.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.