Sujet : Re: Linux advocacy
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 24. Sep 2024, 22:31:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <7pb6fjh0mrcih3gahbk9onfesi9n0ngbff@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:20:02 +0100, Sn!pe wrote:
vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
Maybe that's because, Linux just works,
>
Yay! That's been true of Mac OS for many years ...
>
At the cost of limiting what you can actually get to “work”.
>
Apple has not been one for offering its users lots of options. And it is
gradually and slowly turning macOS into IOS, locking it down even further.
macOS is cool because of its Unix side, the Apple-specific stuff is
laughable. Then again, I did actually prefer M$ Office for Mac, to
the Winblows version (there was a free trial for the Mac version, I
didn't actually buy it, of course). So perhaps if I were using a Mac,
which I won't, there'd be some use of its GUI, though very limited.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.