Sujet : Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1
De : nospam (at) *nospam* example.net (D)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 30. Dec 2024, 12:56:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <8ea48088-bc99-d7fc-0dd8-021562d3e044@example.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
On Sun, 29 Dec 2024, pH wrote:
On 2024-12-28, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
>
On Fri, 27 Dec 2024, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>
On 2024-12-27 18:04, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 14:57:55 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>
Well, I appreciate that I can get gratis a piece of software that is
that good.
>
If you think Free Software could be better, and you would rather not give
money to a proprietary company, why not contribute some of that money to
the development of the Free Software and help make it better?
>
Especially since projects like KDE and LibreOffice really need it.
>
>
Note that money is not the only way to contribute. Even by using the
software you contribute, by making others aware of it, you contribute. I
actually like projects that are not super wealthy. The linux foundation
and firefox are excellent examples of how power corrupts. Would never
dream of contributing with money to those two.
>
This grabs my attention...as essentially a 'bystander' I've been totally
unaware of these types of sentiments.
Can someone give (or point me to) a thumbnail of why someone might have
these opinions?
>
Just curious....
>
Pureheart in Aptos
Sure...
https://lunduke.substack.com/ writes plenty about the corruption of firefox and the linux foundation.
GIMP 3.0.0-RC1
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1