Sujet : Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 25. Oct 2024, 19:36:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <g7pnhjhdffkc4dpktrbptv3q3tur1u82f8@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
candycanearter07 <
candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
wrote:
Nux Vomica <nv@linux.rocks> wrote at 19:45 this Thursday (GMT):
>
Why no GNU/Linux women? I'll tell you fucking why.
>
Computer science was made by MEN for MEN.
>
Women, with their child-bearing intellectual organization,
cannot ever fathom the intricacies and subtleties of computer
programming.
>
Programming was/is an art/science made by MEN for MEN.
>
All those who disagree are not MEN but PUSSIES.
>
I know some.
You mean, Larry was talking out of his butthole, again, say it ain't
so! Yeah, you are the future of Linux computing, he's a drain-bamaged
monkey boy.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.