Re: Linux 6.11

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Linux 6.11
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 03. Oct 2024, 15:14:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <ll8tfjdshj7pf2ncd503qgk6uvatgcqv33@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

To me, vallor's observation of RAM use is normal.  Maybe you
trust Copilot+ to handle that for you.
>
I was referring to his obsession with installing new Linux kernels every
time he changes his underwear.
 
He's "advocating Linux", dude.  The great control he has even as a
Mint user.
>
He's just bored.  Linux is a tinkertoy for adult geeks.


You think NT can't be one?  How do you think Relf controlled his Win10
updating?  How do you think Mark Russinovich started a business to
document Microsoft's internals, that they bought out and named
Sysinternals, hiring him as a tenured resource, he released a
presentation on video in the time of Win7 where he demonstrates MinWin
and talks about OS core matters as an official act for MS.

Reverse-engineering is just par for the course.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Jul 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal