Sujet : Re: Shocking speed difference, Ubuntu vs. Linux Mint, Snap vs. Flatpak
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 20. Mar 2025, 02:21:50
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <m418teFj1knU3@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 09:31:45 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
If anyone out there is a fan of Snaps, then there is a chance they might
not be fans of Ubuntu itself. The idea of switching out the GNU tools
that work perfectly well in favour of rewritten Rust ones is just
idiotic. I would trust the people who produced the GNU tools decades ago
a lot more than the filthy hippies who will rewrite them in Rust for a
theoretical benefit in regards to memory.
I've been running Ubuntu as my main machine. I'm not a fan of GNOME but I
can live with it. I can also like with snap, flatpak, and AppImage.
Brave is the only app that shows up both in the snap and flatpak list.
There isn't a lot of consistency. Firefox and dotnet are snaps, Vim is a
flatpak.