Re: Linux 6.11

vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:

On 29 Sep 2024 08:17:03 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote
in <66f90cff$0$3244$426a74cc@news.free.fr>:

Le 29-09-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit :

>
JOE is the way to go... at least for me.

 
You do what you want, I don't care. It changes nothing at what I said.
The number of users of Joe in the Linux world is very tiny compared to
the number of users of Emacs and vim. It doesn't mean vim and Emacs are
better than JOE or cooledit. It means that cooledit and JOE are far from
the editors of choice of all Linux aficionados.

>
Well sure.  That's the great thing about Linux (and Unix in general):
people can choose the tool of their choice to do whatever.
>
Doesn't mean cooledit, or vim, or Emacs aren't fine editors themselves.
Different strokes, and all that.
>
I like chocolate ice cream, some folks like strawberry.  There is no
"one true ice cream", nor is there "one true editor"...all a matter
of taste.

Yet, you posted this:

https://i.imgur.com/fUXvwdR.png

Isn't my use of images of text, "a matter of taste"?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.