Re: Palemoon is da Greatest Browser

Lester Thorpe <lt@gnu.rocks> wrote:

On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 20:57:47 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote:
>

Which one works better. Ghostery or Palemoon?

>
All browsers should work the same.
>
A browser is just a GUI wrapper around a rendering engine.
The engine converts the HTML/CSS markup into a screen
display.  The browser adds various "features," usually
junk, into the mix.
>
There are many, many browsers but only a very small number
of rendering engines:
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_browser_engines
>
It is the rendering engine where the real difference lies.
Some are better than others in rendering HTML/CSS.
>
There used to be compliance tests for rendering engines but
HTML/CSS has become so convoluted lately that all such tests
are useless:
>
https://www.acidtests.org/
>
Furthermore, very few sites use only HTML/CSS.  Most commercial
sites are overly bloated with ecmascript (i.e. javascipt) which
performs most of the work.
>
Commercial pressure for more grandiose user "experiences" will
continue to drive HTML/CSS/Ecma into ever more ridiculous levels.
>
As a result, only huge enterprises like Google will be able
to produce rendering engines and the associated browser.
Before too long, there will only be one browser.  We are almost
there already.

Free hint, dumbass, your joke browsers suck.  I just rented a movie,
one I'd seen several times before, including new in a theater in 1998,
but an old favorite, one relevant to my life these days, "The Truman
Show" starring Jim Carrey.  Would be trivial to boot up my Fire TV
device, and stream it to my TV, but slight drawback there, the audio
would be through my TV's relatively lo-fi speakers.  By opening a
Chrome window for Amazon Prime Video, dragging it across to my TV as a
second monitor, and letting the audio flow into my computer speakers
and subsequently into my headphones, I get a real "theater"
experience, in my chair in my room.

This is what you are missing, with your retardo setup, dumbass.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.