Sujet : Re: It's over
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 11. Jul 2024, 20:25:05
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <oac09jhbpqf4fkth0bvld071nh23q3g4ds@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On 10 Jul 2024 01:56:18 GMT, rbowman wrote:
>
Consumers have short attention spans but some of them may remember
Windows RT, the last go around with an ARM architecture.
>
Certainly the current effort isn’t quite as crap as Windows RT, but let’s
face it: that’s damning with faint praise.
It's a red herring, at best, rbowman is comparing apples and oranges
ginormously. The laptop I showed is a full Win11 system. This is
going mainstream.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.