Sujet : Re: Palemoon is da Greatest Browser
De : lt (at) *nospam* gnu.rocks (Lester Thorpe)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 16. Nov 2024, 11:23:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
Message-ID : <pan$b6e3$4b899a1c$8107b1c3$601c3872@gnu.rocks>
References : 1 2 3 4
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 20:57:47 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote:
Which one works better. Ghostery or Palemoon?
>
All browsers should work the same.
A browser is just a GUI wrapper around a rendering engine.
The engine converts the HTML/CSS markup into a screen
display. The browser adds various "features," usually
junk, into the mix.
There are many, many browsers but only a very small number
of rendering engines:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_browser_enginesIt is the rendering engine where the real difference lies.
Some are better than others in rendering HTML/CSS.
There used to be compliance tests for rendering engines but
HTML/CSS has become so convoluted lately that all such tests
are useless:
https://www.acidtests.org/Furthermore, very few sites use only HTML/CSS. Most commercial
sites are overly bloated with ecmascript (i.e. javascipt) which
performs most of the work.
Commercial pressure for more grandiose user "experiences" will
continue to drive HTML/CSS/Ecma into ever more ridiculous levels.
As a result, only huge enterprises like Google will be able
to produce rendering engines and the associated browser.
Before too long, there will only be one browser. We are almost
there already.
-- Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.