Re: How pathetic and cringey are some video games these days? Very

DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQMcNpMww_I

>
Uh, you're watching phobe drivel on YouTube, man?  And you're what,
60?

>
61.
>
The only drivel is in the characters and stories of the sick woke games
that are losing many $millions and tons of jobs.
>
The stupid game companies think people will put up with the DEI,
wokeness, and transgender mental illness in their expensive games.
>
Sony just shut down Firewalk Studios, which they purchased in 2023,
after the grotesque game Concord failed to attract more than a few
thousand purchasers.  This is a HUGE business failure, 100% attributable
to wokeness (multiple black female characters, including a 300lb one in
butch clothes, but no White male characters).
>
Fuck them.

 
It's just ridiculous that you even give a crap, man.

>
Is it more or less ridiculous than you caring about Windows?

I *don't* care about what M$ does with their employees, though, I care
about software quality and functionality, Winblows passes but barely.

These game companies are trying to indoctrinate young people and
normalize the mental sickness of transgenderism and the fantasy of
racial equality.
>
One game even has a character with "top surgery scars".
>
It's very evil.  I don't accept their - or your - delusions.

Look, man, racial "equality" may be elusive in a way, although you
generalize about it *far* too much, but individual equality is quite
real, we're all people, we're all equally important, all lives matter
as it were.  As to trans surgeries, I'm not really a fan.  People can
do whatever they want, but I like trans women to have testosterone and
hard cocks, it's natural, it's the way they're made.  Hence my "I'd
suck it *before* she [rectally] fucked me" post, a while back.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.