Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory
De : boraxman (at) *nospam* geidiprime.nospam (Borax Man)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 08. Jul 2025, 10:59:53
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <slrn106pr0p.19ds.boraxman@geidiprime.bvh>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2025-07-08, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2025-07-07, Borax Man <boraxman@geidiprime.nospam> wrote:
On 2025-07-04, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 11:31:45 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man
<boraxman@geidiprime.nospam> wrote in
<slrn106cqh1.8k4.boraxman@geidiprime.bvh>:
>
Why do you think companies push DEI?  It is a way to signal yourself as
a thought leader.
>
"DEI" used to be called "equal-opportunity employer".
>
MAGAs hated it, so when the new term came up, they immediately
went on the "hate parade".
>
>
DEI is nothing to do with "equal-opportunity".  It has to do with virtue
signalling, and meeting arbitrary quotas and requirements put in place
by people who are flummoxed that white countries have white people.
>
It CAN'T be equal opportunity and color-blind if you have quotas and
race targets to hit.
>
Weaponised "Codes of Conduct" can be used to eject people who point this
out.
>
Exactly. When I was a kid in school we were taught to be "color blind." And
I buy into that. The best qualified person for the job, no matter what race
or sex. But that's not what DEI is about. It's about granting special
privileges to anyone is who is not white and/or male. The "E" in DEI doesn't
stand for "equality" it stands for "equity." So-called "equity" means
anti-white (and/or male) exclusion. The "I" is supposed to stand for
"inclusion," but that's also a lie. It also means (again) anyone who isn't
white (or a white male) is "included." Just look at the colleges where
whites are told to stay away from certain events because they're not
"included."
>
DEI is toxic. It's definitely NOT equal opportunity. That's a BS lie. 
>

I don't think "Colourblindness" could have ever worked long term.  It is
basically "Political Correctnes", pretending not to notice the obvious.


Multicultural societies cannot stay free, something was to happen.

I don't object to identity politics per-se, but I do have issue with the
fact that there is no identity political force which protects my
identity.

People can only afford to be ambivalent about identity, when society is
homogeneous.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jul 25 * Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory34Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Jul 25 `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory33Borax Man
1 Jul 25  `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory32Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Jul 25   `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory31Borax Man
3 Jul 25    `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory30Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Jul 25     +* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory28Borax Man
3 Jul 25     i+- Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory1RonB
4 Jul 25     i+* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory5Marc Haber
4 Jul 25     ii`* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Jul 25     ii `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory3vallor
4 Jul 25     ii  `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory2Lester Thorpe
4 Jul 25     ii   `- Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory1vallor
4 Jul 25     i+- Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Jul 25     i`* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory20vallor
4 Jul 25     i +* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory7pothead
4 Jul 25     i i+* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory4pothead
4 Jul 25     i ii+- Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory1pothead
5 Jul 25     i ii`* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory2vallor
5 Jul 25     i ii `- Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory1vallor
5 Jul20:32     i i`* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory2Rudy Canoza
5 Jul21:36     i i `- Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory1%
7 Jul12:30     i `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory12Borax Man
8 Jul10:32     i  +* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory5RonB
8 Jul10:59     i  i`* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory4Borax Man
11 Jul10:04     i  i `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory3RonB
11 Jul12:35     i  i  `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory2Borax Man
12 Jul08:56     i  i   `- Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory1RonB
9 Jul23:56     i  `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 Jul10:05     i   +- Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory1RonB
11 Jul12:37     i   `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory4Borax Man
12 Jul01:30     i    `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Jul12:33     i     `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory2Borax Man
12 Jul13:31     i      `- Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory1Chris Ahlstrom
3 Jul 25     `- Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory1RonB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal