Sujet : Re: Can't Avoid That Shit Rust - Even On Gentoo
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy comp.os.linux.miscDate : 30. Sep 2024, 20:40:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <slrnvflggs.lr8.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
186282@ud0s4.net <
186283@ud0s4.net> wrote at 07:43 this Monday (GMT):
On 9/30/24 3:21 AM, rbowman wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 06:03:29 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
Fun fact: I was reworking an old perpetual-calendar program I first
wrote back in 1980, to use Fortran 90, a few months ago. And I found a
bug in my algorithm that never showed up in any years from the 20th
century, but did manifest itself in the 21st century.
Y2K rides again... I think in many cases the problem was recognized in
the '70s and '80s but nobody expected the code to last decades.
>
Very true - and TROUBLESOME.
>
We all think in the NOW. With effort we can think
a FEW years ahead. But a whole new century or
something similar ... TOO MUCH WORK to future-
proof. We'll "get back to it", sometime ......
Then, people ignore the problem until it's right there.
For instance, the 2038 problem I'm betting will be ignored until 2035.
-- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom