Sujet : Re: Linux advocacy
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 02. Oct 2024, 20:30:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <slrnvfr7mu.2hs3k.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
CrudeSausage <
crude@sausa.ge> wrote at 00:24 this Tuesday (GMT):
On 2024-09-30 3:40 p.m., candycanearter07 wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 07:29 this Monday (GMT):
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 12:37:56 -0400, Joel wrote:
>
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>
It has Unix within it, I grant that ...
>
No, it has the legal right to use the “Unix” trademark, which is not
quite what normal people mean when they say “It’s a Unix system, I know
this!”.
>
That's not really true, you can do anything with it ...
>
Not quite. Apple is insisting on signed software now, so users of Open
Source have to negotiate continual off-putting warnings about “untrusted”
apps every time they try to install something.
Not surprised.
>
There's nothing wrong with signing software if you want to limit the
damage of malware. Open-source will probably work as long as the
software is listed in the Apple Store though.
Yeah, but it would obviously be bad to be forced to publish thru the App
Store
-- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
Linux advocacy
Re: Linux advocacy