Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col advocacy |
candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
wrote:Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote at 11:57 this Friday (GMT):>Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this post; take it under advisement:>On 4 Oct 2024 05:22:19 GMT, rbowman wrote:>
>Linux wasn't any better with xorg.conf and the rest.>
On Linux, they are all text files. Not only can you understand their
contents, you can use diff between different versions to see what has
changed, and copy/paste accordingly.
One issue, however, is that an application can search a number of paths to
find a configuration: /etc/, /usr/share, /usr/lib, and the user's HOME or
HOME/.config or HOME/.local.
>
About as silly as the Redundant Registry!
I think it's more so the sysadmin can define a global default if the
users haven't?
>
This gets into why people would put up with M$ Winblows, the
consistency of results, but they don't even realize that Windows has
tricked-out shit, too, they don't know what PowerShell is. People
with awareness of the software would likely choose Linux, at this
point, because Microsoft has simply gone to the Nth degree, it's
beyond bloated, I have a decent system but it benefits greatly from
not running M$.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.