Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children
De : ronb02NOSPAM (at) *nospam* gmail.com (RonB)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 17. Mar 2025, 08:16:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <slrnvtfj2r.ff5u.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2025-03-16, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-03-16 1:38 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2025-03-15, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-03-15 2:34 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2025-03-14, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 3/14/25 13:10, RonB wrote:
On 2025-03-14, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2025-03-13, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 3/13/25 01:56, RonB wrote:
On 2025-03-11, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 3/11/25 12:47, Dr No wrote:
On 10/03/2025 19:17, CrudeSausage wrote:
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/microsoft-still-promoting-and-funding>
>
Mandatory corporate insurance for "Gender Affirming Care" for children
as young as 3 years old. Microsoft employees encouraged to administer
puberty blockers quickly.
>
>
You can now send your children and get free sex change all paid for by
Microsoft.
>
Now go and fuck off, you Canadian bastard. 51st American state will get
a new governor by the name of Mark Carney who is not a politician, let
alone not an elected MP. How daft Canadians can be!!
>
I agree with that last part. The way the Liberals have mocked democratic
values over the past decades is alarming.
>
It will be nice that Tradeua will be gone. (And Canada can quit being the
butt of the joke whenever their leader comes up). But Carney looks to be an
Epstein client. So, just another member of the Rothschild cabal replacing a
member of the Rosthschild cabal.
>
Yep. In fact, Trudeau hand-picked Carney to be his successor and it
looks like the leader vote a week ago was as fraudulent as the 2020
American election. 200,000 votes were disqualified and nobody from "The
Party" can tell anyone why. Just trust them when they tell you that
Carney got 85% or more of the vote.
>
Sorry to hear that. In Romania the leading candidate can't even run. This
is called "democracy."
>
On Carney from a Telegram Channel...
>
      Mark Carney: Trudeau’s Successor & Keeper of the Woke Purse Strings?
>
      Mark Carney’s biggest challenge won’t be fixing Canada’s crumbling
      economy, securing its borders, or even figuring out how to navigate U.S.
      tariffs under Trump 2.0. Nope. His real mission? Carrying the torch for
      Trudeau’s woke crusade, where “gender equality” isn’t about equal
      opportunity but rather a blank check for social engineering on a global
      scale—to the tune of $11 billion.
>
     🔹 Trudeau’s Gender Agenda: Over the past decade, Canada burned through
     billions funding “overseas gender initiatives,” lining the pockets of
     international NGOs while Canadians faced soaring inflation, housing
     crises, and skyrocketing debt.
>
     🔹 Carney’s Next Move? Will he double down on Trudeau’s obsession with
     “gender empowerment” abroad, or will he dare to reverse course and put
     Canadian taxpayers before woke vanity projects?
>
     🔹 Follow the Money: The Liberals aren’t just about “gender equity.”
     They’re about ideological capture. Their “progressive” policies always
     seem to end up as grants for well-connected activists, think tanks, and
     UN-backed slush funds—while working-class Canadians struggle to make ends
     meet.
>
      Carney was hand-picked for a reason. Not to fix Trudeau’s wreckage, but
      to keep the same neoliberal-globalist agenda alive.
>
      The woke mind virus has already cost Canada dearly. Will Carney be the
      one to finally pull the plug, or will he just keep feeding the beast?
>
      🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
>
Again, sorry. The Canadians need to clear out these Woke morons completely —
probably would if they could have fair elections.
>
>
At this point, I would actually love for Trump to go ahead with the
threat and take the country over. I have no faith whatsoever in our
people's ability to elect competent representatives.
>
When I lived in Montana in the 70s, there was a movement for Western Canada
to break away from Eastern Canada. Too bad they didn't do it.
>
The movement still exists, and I would bet that if Trump made a decent
offer to Alberta for it to become a state, they would at least vote on
it. Alberta generally gets no benefit from being within Canada, mostly
because of how resistant Quebec ecologists are to Alberta's main export:
oil. America wouldn't prevent the province from enriching itself.
 
I'm guessing Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba (maybe?). One of my favorite
TV shows is Corner Gas, so Saskatchewan has to be included. I actually
worked in Saskatchewan putting up grain elevators when I was a kid (late
teens). Apparently they couldn't get any Canadians to work, they all got 40
hours of minimum wage on welfare (that's what we were told anyhow). (This
was in the early 70s.)
>
This is why I don't believe the welfare system should even exist. If you
want to survive, work. If you don't want to, you are free to become a
burden to your family for as long as they can tolerate your parasitic
behaviour. The welfare system does little more than make able-bodied
people lazy and attract third-world parasites.
>
Provinces Trump would definitely not want as part of the United States
are British Columbia (the cities are extremely woke even if the regions
are conservative), Ontario (their brand of conservatism resembles the
centre-left at best) and Quebec (there is no appeasing the French
Canadians). The others would probably benefit from being a part of the
United States.
 
Yeah, I guess British Columbia is just continuation of the Left Coast, Los
Angeles, San Francisco, Portland and Seattle. Some beautiful country in
British Columbia, however (also in Washington, Oregon and California).
>
It's too bad that such beautiful land has to be ruined by progressives.
I fully believe that the people living in the regions outsides of big
cities are productive members of society. However, the cities themselves
attract lots of progressives who believe that being a barista is a
career. These people settle in large number inside of those cities and
their vote tends to neutralize that of hard-working suburbanites. The
result is that taxes increase as does crime, and life in general becomes
much worse for everyone. Californians see this in their high taxes,
dangerous, excrement-covered cities. The people of Oregon see the same
thing. Obviously, the people in British Columbia are feeling it too.
>
Progressives should be forced to live in places like the Northwest
Territories where they are free to show us how progressive politics can
turn a barren wasteland into a utopia. They should be barred from
settling in places that are already beautiful since they do nothing more
than destroy them.

There's some empty, alkaline desert land in Nevada just waiting for the
Woke. They should be happy there. There's not much they can do to ruin the
enverionment — it's pretty much already ruined.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien

Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Mar 25 * Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children17Dr No
13 Mar 25 `* Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children16RonB
14 Mar 25  `* Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children15RonB
14 Mar 25   `* Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children14RonB
14 Mar 25    +- Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children1%
15 Mar 25    `* Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children12RonB
15 Mar 25     +* Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children4rbowman
15 Mar 25     i+- Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children1rbowman
16 Mar 25     i`* Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children2RonB
16 Mar 25     i `- Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children1rbowman
15 Mar 25     +* Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children3rbowman
16 Mar 25     i`* Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children2RonB
16 Mar 25     i `- Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children1rbowman
16 Mar 25     `* Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children4RonB
16 Mar 25      +- Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children1rbowman
17 Mar 25      `* Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children2RonB
17 Mar 25       `- Re: Microsoft Still Promoting and Funding Sex Changes for Children1rbowman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal