Sujet : Re: Shocking speed difference, Ubuntu vs. Linux Mint, Snap vs. Flatpak
De : ronb02NOSPAM (at) *nospam* gmail.com (RonB)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 20. Mar 2025, 06:35:53
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <slrnvtna9o.hpf.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2025-03-20, rbowman <
bowman@montana.com> wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 09:21:09 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
>
Ubuntu 24.04 still uses X11. It seems to default to Wayland after that
release. The slow performance really does seem to be the result of Snap
since even the interface itself shouldn't be slower as it is also based
on GTK3 like Cinnamon.
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Wayland_(protocol)#Desktop_Linux_distributions
>
"Ubuntu shipped with Wayland by default in Ubuntu 17.10 (Artful Aardvark).
[92] However, Ubuntu 18.04 LTS reverted to X.Org by default due to several
issues.[93][94] Since Ubuntu 21.04, Wayland is the default again."
>
OS: Ubuntu oracular 24.10 x86_64
Host: SER
Kernel: Linux 6.11.0-19-generic
Uptime: 7 days, 55 mins
Packages: 3007 (dpkg), 35 (snap)
Shell: bash 5.2.32
Display (Acer Technologies 24"): 1920x1080 @ 60Hz [External]
DE: GNOME 47.0
WM: Mutter (Wayland)
WM Theme: Yaru
>
That's the Ubuntu box. The Fedora 41 box
>
DE: KDE Plasma 6.3.3
WM: Kwin (Wayland)
WM Theme: Breeze
That's what I thought (when using Ubuntu).
-- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
Re: Shocking speed difference, Ubuntu vs. Linux Mint, Snap vs. Flatpak
Re: Shocking speed difference, Ubuntu vs. Linux Mint, Snap vs. Flatpak