Sujet : Re: How To Improve This Group
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 10. Apr 2025, 00:40:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <slrnvve1a5.3d82b.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Farley Flud <
ff@linux.rocks> wrote at 20:55 this Wednesday (GMT):
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 19:00:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>
Well, if you COULD get more people to migrate to USENET from traditional
social media, that would be great. I personally don't think many people
are going to want to learn a new software for such an old protocol.
>
>
Well, then, maybe they should stop using email. After all, that protocol
goes back to at least 1975.
Most people use a website for email, and Gmail/Outlook.
I am sick of these assholes who denigrate a medium simply because
it's origin goes back a few decades.
>
Communication protocols don't have "best buy" dates. They are
valid forever.
I agree, but the whole "brand new shiny tech" pull is a very strong pull
for some.
I am reminded of the Micro$oft strategy that tried to discredit
Linux because it was based upon Unix which is an "ancient" OS.
>
Fuck Micro$soft and fuck YOU.
sorry
Usenet is still very much viable as is IRC. All that is required
is for more people to start using it -- again.
>
The case is closed.
I agree, the main problem from my pov is barrier to entry and
"precivable" benefits. Yes, obviously, USENET is great for being simple
and decrentralized, but the average person would not care/understand
what being "decentralized" means, and the simplicity is seen as a
drawback. And as for barrier to entry, the only real client people would
be likely/willing to use would be Thunderbird, since everything else is
either old (again, /I/ don't care, but ppl definitely would), highly
specialized FOSS programs that most of the time are targeted to Linux,
or a TUI program. And they have to configure the newsreader to connect
to a server, FIND a server, etc etc.. and no layman would go through
that just for a "retro forum experience that has barely any users". As
well as the general tech illiteracy. So, IF the barrier to entry was
lowered, and potentially a webapp made, people MIGHT be willing to try
it. I think that's a pretty long shot, though.
-- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom