Sujet : Re: Linux advocacy
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 25. Sep 2024, 07:58:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <u2d7fjlkkqhe2pp56kqfka1sjejluarvoh@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 02:16:36 -0400, Joel wrote:
>
And yet I'm accomplishing everything with openSUSE. It's almost like
commercial OSes' advantages are an illusion ...
>
But openSUSE *is* commercial.
Vaguely, perhaps, but it didn't cost money. You're just obsessing
over the word.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
…