Re: It's over

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 12:01:33 -0400, Joel wrote:

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 11:22:49 -0400, DFS wrote:
>

[ARM] doesn't offer enough advantages over CISC.

>
RISC architectures like ARM and RISC-V offer plenty of advantages, but
you need native code to take advantage of them. That native code almost
entirely runs under Linux.

 
They will start compiling Win64 apps for ARM, though, with these devices
hitting the market.

>
They won’t start “hitting the market” until customers demand them.

Dell already has this XPS 13 model.  A laptop.  A workstation.  It's
going to move toward this being a more implemented alternative to
IntelAMD.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.