This FOSS Thang :-)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : This FOSS Thang :-)
De : Physfitfreak (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Physfitfreak)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 12. Mar 2024, 01:00:37
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <uso2en$184pn$1@solani.org>
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Money in the software business is never an issue for the customer. If they do what they're supposed to do, and nothing more than that, openly or subterraneanly, the money paid is well, well, well worth it. So this "FOSS" thing everybody here is pro or con about, should really be just "OSS". The issue, always, is the _abuse_ that the user experiences in using them.
As far as the OS is concerned, Windows OS is an abusive product. It is not so because you have to pay for it. It is certainly so because it abuses the users in multiple, different ways. Furthermore, it does so deliberately. Therefore, this is not just the nuisance involved. Yes, forced lengthy and time-consuming updates are bothersome, but that's not the big problem. Problem is that (for instance) they _deliberately_ remove all your modifications and adjustments that you had spent time to create, each time such updates are made, if any of them prevents them to subject the user to commercials.
Say, this "Edge" thingy. They force it on you certainly for a reason :) I have no doubt, the Edge running in the background without even your knowledge is collecting and selling your behavior to a myriad of commercial companies.
They're crooks.
Using the users' paid-for equipment to make money by selling user information without permission, and without sharing the revenue thus made with them, is simply theft. So it is abuse.
Microsoft owes each user millions of dollars, for ruining their time, and using their equipments without their permission, to make money.
They're crooks!
So what is this Linux then.
Linux, for me, and perhaps only in my imagination, gives the promise that if I'm careful with it, it won't abuse me. But I'd be damned if I trust that :)
Haven't started it yet, but after I seriously begin using Linux, if it turns out relatively non-abusive, I may even pay a reasonable price for using it (donation or something). But if it pans out to be abusive to me, which it might, then there's really no difference between Windows and Linux.
Who's certain these Linux OS's of yours aren't selling information about you to commercial companies? They certainly do so for the NSA, this much is proven. So why not to commercial companies as well?
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Oct 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal