Re: Linux advocacy

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Linux advocacy
De : recscuba_google (at) *nospam* huntzinger.com (-hh)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 26. Sep 2024, 04:19:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vd2jsc$3le3m$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/24/24 2:29 PM, Lester Thorpe wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:20:02 +0100, Sn!pe wrote:
 
>
A 'puter is supposed to be a tool to do a job,
the underpinnings should ideally be unnoticeable.
>
 Incorrect, Apple fathead.
 A computer is a "general purpose machine," which means
that it doesn't do anything but it embodies the potential
to do everything.
Yet over the past 40 years, they've grown into being much more than just a PDP-11 with a teletype terminal. They now serve many duties, one of which is even cat pictures! /s

(Apple shitheads don't venture within 100 miles of Comp Sci.)
 However, in order to do something, a computer must be
"programmed," and thus the "underpinnings" are of paramount
importance.
 In contrast, Apple devices, and Apple users, are mere appliances.
Oh, so did you write your own newsreader from scratch to fabricate this very post, "Lester"?  Or did you use someone else's canned software as your productivity tool, so you're just being a hypocrite?

They are set to do a single task, however convoluted that task
may appear.
 But the Apple user, like YOU, is a total lackey.
 He will, without question, hand over his BIG $BUCKS to Apple
and associates for the brief luxury of having a "turn key"
system.
Oh, look:  This "BIG $BUCKS" another explicit reference to cost, in the context of Apple products vs others.  Now tagged for those who try to deny the "Linux cheapskates" topic.  :-)

Don't miss your subscription payment, sucker, or else you
will be dead in the fucking water.
 Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
 What fools these Appleheads be.
Hmm...perhaps this "Lester" can fill me in on just what onerous subscription payments I'm allegedly making, where, and for what?
-hh

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Sep 24 * Linux advocacy112vallor
24 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux advocacy6Joel
28 Sep 24 i`* Re: Linux advocacy5Stéphane CARPENTIER
30 Sep 24 i +- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i `* Re: Linux advocacy3Joel
5 Oct 24 i  +- Re: Linux advocacy1DFS
12 Oct 24 i  `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux advocacy4-hh
24 Sep 24 i`* Re: Linux advocacy3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 i +- Re: Linux advocacy1-hh
24 Sep 24 i `- Re: Linux advocacy1vallor
24 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux advocacy80Sn!pe
24 Sep 24 i+* Re: Linux advocacy11Joel
25 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Linux advocacy10vallor
25 Sep 24 ii `* Re: Linux advocacy9Joel
25 Sep 24 ii  +* Re: Linux advocacy3vallor
25 Sep 24 ii  i`* Re: Linux advocacy2Joel
25 Sep 24 ii  i `- Re: Linux advocacy1%
25 Sep 24 ii  +* Re: Linux advocacy4DFS
25 Sep 24 ii  i+* Re: Linux advocacy2rbowman
25 Sep 24 ii  ii`- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii  i`- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii  `- Re: Linux advocacy1%
24 Sep 24 i+* Re: Linux advocacy7Lester Thorpe
24 Sep 24 ii+- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
26 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Linux advocacy5-hh
26 Sep 24 ii `* Re: Linux advocacy4vallor
26 Sep 24 ii  `* Re: Linux advocacy3-hh
26 Sep 24 ii   +- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
30 Sep 24 ii   `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 i+* Re: Linux advocacy57Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Linux advocacy56Joel
25 Sep 24 ii `* Re: Linux advocacy55Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii  `* Re: Linux advocacy54Joel
25 Sep 24 ii   `* Re: Linux advocacy53DFS
25 Sep 24 ii    +* Re: Linux advocacy31Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii    i+* Re: Linux advocacy3Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    ii`* Re: Linux advocacy2DFS
25 Sep 24 ii    ii `- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i+* Re: Linux advocacy18rbowman
25 Sep 24 ii    ii`* Re: Linux advocacy17Sn!pe
25 Sep 24 ii    ii +* Re: Linux advocacy14rbowman
26 Sep 24 ii    ii i+- Re: Linux advocacy1rbowman
26 Sep 24 ii    ii i`* Re: Linux advocacy12Joel
26 Sep 24 ii    ii i `* Re: Linux advocacy11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii    ii i  `* Re: Linux advocacy10Joel
30 Sep 24 ii    ii i   `* Re: Linux advocacy9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24 ii    ii i    `* Re: Linux advocacy8candycanearter07
1 Oct 24 ii    ii i     +- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
2 Oct 24 ii    ii i     +* Re: Linux advocacy4candycanearter07
3 Oct 24 ii    ii i     i`* Re: Linux advocacy3candycanearter07
3 Oct 24 ii    ii i     i +- Re: Linux advocacy1rbowman
3 Oct 24 ii    ii i     i `- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
4 Oct 24 ii    ii i     `* Re: Linux advocacy2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 ii    ii i      `- Re: Linux advocacy1candycanearter07
26 Sep 24 ii    ii `* Re: Linux advocacy2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii    ii  `- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i`* Re: Linux advocacy9DFS
26 Sep 24 ii    i +* Re: Linux advocacy4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii    i i`* Re: Linux advocacy3DFS
26 Sep 24 ii    i i `* Re: Linux advocacy2-hh
26 Sep 24 ii    i i  `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Sep 24 ii    i `* Re: Linux advocacy4Stéphane CARPENTIER
30 Sep 24 ii    i  `* Re: Linux advocacy3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 ii    i   `* Re: Linux advocacy2Stéphane CARPENTIER
12 Oct 24 ii    i    `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii    +* Re: Linux advocacy6Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i`* Re: Linux advocacy5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii    i `* Re: Linux advocacy4Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i  `* Re: Linux advocacy3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii    i   +- Re: Linux advocacy1Joel
25 Sep 24 ii    i   `- Re: Linux advocacy1DFS
26 Sep 24 ii    `* Re: Linux advocacy15-hh
26 Sep 24 ii     +* Re: Linux advocacy2Joel
26 Sep 24 ii     i`- Re: Linux advocacy1-hh
26 Sep 24 ii     +* Re: Linux advocacy7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii     i+* Re: Linux advocacy2vallor
26 Sep 24 ii     ii`- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii     i`* Re: Linux advocacy4-hh
30 Sep 24 ii     i `* Re: Linux advocacy3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24 ii     i  `* Re: Linux advocacy2-hh
4 Oct 24 ii     i   `- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 ii     +- Re: Linux advocacy1Chris Ahlstrom
26 Sep 24 ii     +* Re: Linux advocacy2-hh
27 Sep 24 ii     i`- Re: Linux advocacy1RonB
27 Sep 24 ii     `* Re: Linux advocacy2RonB
27 Sep 24 ii      `- Re: Linux advocacy1-hh
25 Sep 24 i+* Re: Linux advocacy3vallor
25 Sep 24 ii+- Re: Linux advocacy1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 ii`- Re: Linux advocacy1Sn!pe
28 Sep 24 i`- Re: Linux advocacy1Stéphane CARPENTIER
24 Sep 24 +- Re: Linux advocacy1Lester Thorpe
24 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux advocacy5candycanearter07
25 Sep 24 i`* Re: Linux advocacy4vallor
25 Sep 24 i `* Re: Linux advocacy3rbowman
25 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Linux advocacy2Chris Ahlstrom
25 Sep 24 i   `- Re: Linux advocacy1candycanearter07
30 Sep 24 `* Re: Linux advocacy15John McCue
30 Sep 24  +* Re: Linux advocacy6vallor
30 Sep 24  i`* Re: Linux advocacy5candycanearter07
1 Oct 24  i +- Re: Linux advocacy1rbowman
1 Oct 24  i `* Re: Linux advocacy3vallor
4 Oct 24  `* Re: Linux advocacy8Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal