Re: Scientific American

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Scientific American
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 07. Oct 2024, 04:17:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vdvjsi$1ipl0$3@dont-email.me>
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
That was a cool magazine. Martin Gardner’s maths column was how most
people discovered Conway’s “Game Of Life”, back in the day.

Back when computers were scarce and expensive, MIT, I think it was, was
able to devote a lot of computing time to messing around with cellular
automata (purely in aid of research, of course), and discovering lots of
remarkable things like “spaceships” and “glider guns”. And conjecturing
about “Garden of Eden” patterns (board configurations which could not be
produced as the immediate descendant of any possible prior configuration).

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Oct 24 * Re: Scientific American11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Oct 24 `* Re: Scientific American10rbowman
10 Oct 24  `* Re: Scientific American9Chris Ahlstrom
10 Oct 24   +* Re: Scientific American7rbowman
10 Oct 24   i+* Re: Scientific American3Chris Ahlstrom
11 Oct 24   ii+- Re: Scientific American1rbowman
11 Oct 24   ii`- Re: Scientific American1RonB
11 Oct 24   i+* Re: Scientific American2RonB
11 Oct 24   ii`- Re: Scientific American1rbowman
12 Oct 24   i`- Re: Scientific American1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 Oct 24   `- Re: Scientific American1RonB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal