Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col advocacy |
On 2024-10-23 2:56 a.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:56:45 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:>
On 2024-10-22 12:43 a.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 21:37:36 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:>
>Even the dumbest citizen knows that it wouldn't make sense for the>
presidency to be decided by the metropolises of the country ...
I’ve heard that nonsense from countless supporters of the
Dumbfuckistani voting system, and I still don’t understand it.
>
Don’t you take it as “self-evident” that all your people are created
equal? If so, why shouldn’t their votes count equally too?
Because the very nature of agriculture means that it would be impossible
for states doing the real work to have as many people as the areas where
people collect welfare.
If you mean “large cities”, those are in fact the backbone of your
economy. The US isn’t an agrarian society any more.
Why should the value of someone’s vote depend on where they live?
If the people in those "large cities" do not receive food, what will
happen to them? None of them would even know where to start if food
became scarce since they have no useful survival skills.
>
The reason the value of someone's vote means more is because unlike you
progressives, the forefathers understood how agriculture works. Also,
they knew that smart asses like you would starve without the labour of
people who work on farms.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.