Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col advocacy |
On 2024-10-29 3:08 a.m., RonB wrote:On 2024-10-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:>On 2024-10-28 12:48 p.m., DFS wrote:On 10/26/2024 9:30 AM, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:>
>
>Le 24-10-2024, DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> a écrit :>From>
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/export/
Let say that the major part of this list is only different versions of
the same product. I'll try o remember that when you say there are too
many Linux distros.
>
Right now distrowatch lists 165 active x86_64 desktop Linux distros.
>
But 8-10 distros make up 90% of Linux desktop users.
>
What's the lesson here?
People fork for the sake of forking rather than to improve anything.
The lesson? Linux is open source and people are free do what they want with
it. No justification needed for forking it.
Choice is good.
It is great in theory, but everyone seems to want to have their own
distribution so rather than working together for a common goal, they're
working apart. Theoretically, the improvements go into the same pool no
matter what but I wonder if they actually do.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.