Sujet : Re: Kilowatts
De : OFeem1987 (at) *nospam* teleworm.us (Chris Ahlstrom)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 16. Jan 2025, 14:06:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None
Message-ID : <vmb08v$3ginl$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
vallor wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 18:01:14 +0000, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote in
<pan$55db6$3fc31e5a$d165b8af$dd7e7acf@linux.rocks>:
>
On 15 Jan 2025 17:07:43 GMT, vallor wrote:
So according to Feeb, a monopole antenna is a dipole antenna.
Yes, it fucking is.
>
No, it fucking isn't.
>
And you know it. Who do you think you're fooling?
>
More's the point: Who are people going to listen to?
Someone with the references that back him up, or some
Usenet Poe troll crank living with 2009 drives?
In Christopher Coleman's book, "Foundations of Radio for Scientest and
Technologists", there's a nice chapter on various kinds of antennas.
Section 8.5 is "The Monopole Antenna".
The equations in this book are pretty strenuous for guys like me that have not
studied calculus and differential equations in about 30 years.
-- Status Substitution: Using an object with intellectual or fashionable cachet tosubstitute for an object that is merely pricey: "Brian, you left yourcopy of Camus in your brother's BMW." -- Douglas Coupland, "Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated
Culture"