Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms
De : nospam (at) *nospam* needed.invalid (Paul)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy alt.comp.os.windows-11
Date : 20. Feb 2025, 15:00:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vp7cig$2s5u4$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Ratcatcher/2.0.0.25 (Windows/20130802)
On Thu, 2/20/2025 7:19 AM, Anton Shepelev wrote:
Paul:
 
I run Okular in both Windows and bash shell, as an example
of cats sleeping with dogs.
 
Impossible: Okural is a GUI program, not a terminal one.
 

Possible.

The "bash shell", so called, has a graphics stack called WSLg.

I run Firefox in it every day :-) Linux Firefox. On Windows.

    [Picture]

     https://i.postimg.cc/sDd22g3Q/bash-shell-WSLg-Firefox.gif

Running Linux okular is just as easy as Linux Firefox, to operate.

I can run Windows, bash shell (linux kernel) container, VMWare,
and VirtualBox all at the same time. At one time, it wasn't advised
to do that, but all of that is running under an inverted hypervisor.
The Windows OS is virtualized, as is the bash shell, and the
two VM hosts. VirtualBox had to be modified to run under an
inverted hypervisor, and between VirtualBox running in Linux
and VirtualBox running in?/on? Windows, the Virtualbox developers
have to support two hypervisor environments.

There is no block diagram now, for Windows, showing the virtualization
model. We have to guess how it works.

The Task Manager isn't well suited for measuring the activity
on the machine. I monitor the electrical power consumption,
as a double check that nothing is going on that I cannot "see".

   Paul


   Paul


   Paul

Date Sujet#  Auteur
16 Feb 25 * Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms15Paul
17 Feb 25 +- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Feb 25 `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms13Paul
20 Feb 25  `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms12Anton Shepelev
20 Feb 25   +* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms10Paul
20 Feb 25   i+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms8Anton Shepelev
20 Feb 25   ii`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms7Paul
20 Feb 25   ii +- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1rbowman
20 Feb 25   ii `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Feb 25   ii  `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms4Paul
21 Feb 25   ii   `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms3Kerr-Mudd, John
22 Feb 25   ii    `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Paul
26 Feb 25   ii     `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Kerr-Mudd, John
21 Feb 25   i`- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Daniel70
20 Feb 25   `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Brian Gregory

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal