Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col advocacy |
On 2025-02-24 9:10 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 20:55:55 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:>
If you can still get Windows or MacOS
running on the machine and it doesn't lock you out in any way, don't
bother with Linux. It's fine, but it's not always worth the struggle.
I think people are habituated to the kind of struggles you need to get
Windows working, so they discount those compared to effort on a Linux
installation. Because Linux is less familiar (even though the
configuration setups are better understood), that is somehow seen as a
greater struggle.
It's not even that. Even if you have the patience to set Linux up
properly, you'll find that a good amount of your hardware won't end up
working. There are always people here and there who claim that they get
it working, but when you follow their own instructions and the
distribution they've used, you get different results. Heck, I followed
the instructions to enable the hardware encryption of my nvme through
Linux and, lo and behold, they didn't work. It works fine in Windows if
you follow the instructions (which require you to have a separate
Windows installation on a USB drive), but Linux won't even get past the
unlocking stage. That is part of why a lot of us just stick to Windows
or MacOS.
I just got my 2017 MacBook Air with MacOS Monterey yesterday. I am
surprised that most of the software I need installs fine (except
Microsoft Office 365 which requires at least MacOS 13), and the hardware
is in perfect order. The SSD still has 75% health, the inside of the
laptop was fairly clean, HDMI sound somehow works through a
mini-DisplayPort to HDMI adapter and suspend/wake works as it should.
There is no reason to install Linux on this, an eight-year-old Mac I got
for $150. Considering that, I now wonder what hardware is a candidate
for Linux.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.